<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conserving ignorance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sarahditum.com/2009/08/28/conserving-ignorance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sarahditum.com/2009/08/28/conserving-ignorance/</link>
	<description>Freelance writer and journalist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:21:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your ballot or your job &#171; Paperhouse</title>
		<link>http://sarahditum.com/2009/08/28/conserving-ignorance/#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Your ballot or your job &#171; Paperhouse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sarahditum.com/?p=2301#comment-1640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] bias&#8221;, and how does he know the BBC has one? (Personally, I think there&#8217;s merit in Medhi Hassan’s contention of right-wing bias in the corporation, while Greg Philo&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bias&#8221;, and how does he know the BBC has one? (Personally, I think there&#8217;s merit in Medhi Hassan’s contention of right-wing bias in the corporation, while Greg Philo&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right-wing bias and the BBC&#160;</title>
		<link>http://sarahditum.com/2009/08/28/conserving-ignorance/#comment-1553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Right-wing bias and the BBC&#160;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sarahditum.com/?p=2301#comment-1553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] More Paperhouse: Conserving ignorance [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More Paperhouse: Conserving ignorance [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberal Conspiracy &#187; Right-wing bias and the BBC</title>
		<link>http://sarahditum.com/2009/08/28/conserving-ignorance/#comment-1551</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liberal Conspiracy &#187; Right-wing bias and the BBC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sarahditum.com/?p=2301#comment-1551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Paperhouse: Conserving ignorance  &#183; About the author: David Semple is a regular contributor to Liberal Conspiracy. He blogs [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Paperhouse: Conserving ignorance  &middot; About the author: David Semple is a regular contributor to Liberal Conspiracy. He blogs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://sarahditum.com/2009/08/28/conserving-ignorance/#comment-1550</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sarahditum.com/?p=2301#comment-1550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m used to him slinging this stuff out from the Mail - surprised that NS couldn&#039;t find anyone more compelling to put the opposing view. But maybe the idea that the BBC is teeming with Marxism is strictly the domain of ranters and loons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m used to him slinging this stuff out from the Mail &#8211; surprised that NS couldn&#8217;t find anyone more compelling to put the opposing view. But maybe the idea that the BBC is teeming with Marxism is strictly the domain of ranters and loons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uponnothing</title>
		<link>http://sarahditum.com/2009/08/28/conserving-ignorance/#comment-1548</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uponnothing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sarahditum.com/?p=2301#comment-1548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Completely agree. Hitchens, like many Mail writers, argues using fictional ideas; using the &#039;what if&#039; principle. Here he is really saying: &#039;if any evidence of left-wing bias existed, it would definately reveal a left-wing bias&#039;. As usual he tries to imply that the majority of people agree with him, although this to is an unfounded presumption.

The BBC and other news channels have to prove it has no bias, and it is with great hypocrisy that an extremely slanted press accuse the BBC of bias.

The only bias the BBC has is towards the truth; it is this that the lying press really hate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely agree. Hitchens, like many Mail writers, argues using fictional ideas; using the &#8216;what if&#8217; principle. Here he is really saying: &#8216;if any evidence of left-wing bias existed, it would definately reveal a left-wing bias&#8217;. As usual he tries to imply that the majority of people agree with him, although this to is an unfounded presumption.</p>
<p>The BBC and other news channels have to prove it has no bias, and it is with great hypocrisy that an extremely slanted press accuse the BBC of bias.</p>
<p>The only bias the BBC has is towards the truth; it is this that the lying press really hate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

